(Photo Credits: Screengrab from Lover of Men’s Official YouTube Account)
The life and legacy of Abraham Lincoln, one of America’s most revered presidents, has been studied for over a century, but a new documentary released on September 6 titled, Lover of Men: The Untold History of Abraham Lincoln, directed by Shaun Peterson, invites viewers to reconsider what they think they know about the 16th president. This film delves into the ongoing debate among scholars about Lincoln’s sexuality, exploring the possibility that he may have been gay or bisexual.
For years, historians and researchers have speculated about Lincoln’s intimate relationships, particularly with several men who were close to him throughout his life. The documentary carefully examines letters, journals, and other historical documents that suggest Lincoln had deep and perhaps romantic relationships with men such as Joshua Speed, a close friend with whom Lincoln shared a bed for several years, and Captain David Derickson, who was rumored to have shared Lincoln’s bed during his presidency when Mary Todd Lincoln was away.
The film opens up a dialogue about the complexities of human relationships, especially in historical contexts where open discussions about sexuality were taboo. Landmark studies regarding this topic included C.A. Tripp, author of The Intimate World of Abraham Lincoln (2005) and other historians who have explored this aspect of Lincoln’s life like Love Stories: Sex between Men before Homosexuality (2003) by Jonathan Ned Katz.
Some of the most intriguing points discussed in the documentary are Lincoln’s close friendships and correspondence with men, where language that was considered affectionate or intimate by today’s standards might have held different connotations in the 19th century. However, Peterson and his featured scholars argue that there are enough hints and indications to warrant a closer examination of Lincoln’s relationships. They also explore how understanding Lincoln’s potential queerness might influence how we view his empathy and progressive stance on certain social issues of his time.
It’s possible that Lincoln’s sexuality was more openly acknowledged during his era than it is in the present day. “In the 19th century, people were very familiar with the fact that Lincoln slept with men, and it was not considered shocking,” explains John Stauffer, a professor in the fields of English and African and African American Studies, who is featured in the documentary.
Lover of Men doesn’t just ask whether Lincoln was gay; it asks why it matters. For many, exploring Lincoln’s potential queerness is about reclaiming a more inclusive history and understanding how hidden identities have shaped American leadership. The documentary sheds light on the importance of looking at history through a broader lens, considering all possibilities rather than sticking strictly to heteronormative narratives.
As the film gains attention, it has sparked discussions on social media and among historians, encouraging people to think critically about how we define historical figures. While some may resist these interpretations, others see it as an opportunity to better understand the human complexities of one of America’s most iconic leaders.
Lover of Men: The Untold History of Abraham Lincoln is a provocative and thoughtful exploration that challenges us to rethink the stories we’ve been told about one of America’s most famous presidents and consider the untold aspects that history might have missed.
Watch the trailer of Lover of Men: The Untold History of Abraham Lincoln below:
Happy viewing!
Well, imagine that. A white president from the Republican party, the party that formed to eliminate slavery and fought the Democrats for the next 100+ years over civil rights, might have been gay or bi. Will wonders never cease?…
We seem to be conveniently forgetting that the Liberal/Progressive/Democratic Party in its past was not always in support of Gays. Until they found support could get them votes (as it later sought with Women, Blacks and Latinos), they changed their stance. In the end, Gays (and now many Women, Black and Latinos) found it was all talk and not much change so many of them didn’t line up as sheep along Liberal/Progressive/Democratic lines (as those do who “drink the KoolAid” without doing research before they vote). .. Could Lincoln have fancied men? Could those who vote(d) Republican/Conservative be/have been Gay?… Read more »
While I understand people’s desire to delve and question, even as they do the same about Hollywood personalities and other celebrities today, I note that general life context is a matter that people today often miss. We tend to look at all things through our eyes, not through theirs. Nowadays, while persons might comfortably go outside wearing minimal clothing, those same persons are extremely private otherwise. Even in restrooms, men put a urinal between them. Toilets are enclosed in stalls with doors. Military barracks may have only two-person rooms. Gyms have single showers. As late as the 1960’s, barracks were… Read more »
Does anybody care?
If you don’t, fine … and please don’t take time to vote.
What does that have to do with Lincoln’s bedroom actions?
Now, the thing I’ld love to know a definite answer:
Did Lincoln own/have slaves?
He did not and I doubt during his younger years he could have afforded a slave had even wanted one.
It’s generally researched that he didn’t personally own slaves. He had associates that did and we can expect that some on his family over time did. Now adays that’d make him guilty.
Sex slaves?
No, slaves like the 1’s he “freed”….hince the discussion question since I’ve heard it several times.
“Romantic friendships” were a recognized relationship before the 20th century. They were not necessarily sexual. Sharing a bed was normal behavior. Families might all sleep in one bed. Whether or not they had sex was not an issue then. It is prurient to push too far into it, so to speak, but fascinating to speculate. My professor in college said that when he was in college, the dorm rooms had double beds and the guys all slept together…but NOTHING HAPPENED. I believe I piped up and said, “maybe in your room”…I think he eventually chuckled about it.
So what if he was bi-sexual, as long as he does his job and does not involve children or animals. I don’t have a problem with anyone and who they are with. That’s what is wrong with some people wanting to know other people’s business, don’t worry about other people and their business, take care of your own business, and Stop Hating On Other People.
a documentary = $$$ that is why the intrusion into Lincoln’s personal life
Well said!!!
The real question is…why does anyone care about a famous deceased president private sex life and sexuality? To me, that’s just so disrespectful to the dead especially when people make claims or assumptions about their lives and they’re not even alive to defend themselves against it or possibly never wanted anyone to know about their damn business on the matter! I feel like it’s one thing overreaching into other people’s business who are alive, but it’s practically obsession if anyone worries about any deceased person’s sex life like that. ALL WE NEED TO KNOW IS THAT HE WAS AN AMAZING… Read more »
He was totally against slavery and one of the greatest Presidents ever. He was against blacks running for office, blacks voting and he was against interracial marriages. Just emphasizing that he wasn’t perfect!! As far as his sex life, if he had sex with men I don’t blame him. It feels so dayum good!!!
actually, Lincoln was pragmatic about slavery. he knew that slavery was necessary for the southern economy. the civil war was not about slavery; It was about the preservation of Federal Power and ultimately, the survival of the nation. Slavery was used a rallying point to engage the support from the northern and some of the middle states to fight.
Pragmatic to a point and yes to save the union but also to prevent the spread of slavery to the west. The southern economy was not benefiting as well as it’s been alleged by slavery and has been proved quite the opposite but the slave ‘trade’ did profit significantly to fight for it. Lincoln was very much against enslavement and in the book Lincoln in Private, the 111 found private letters shows his very clear belief in the immoral nature of the practice.
understood but Lincoln was aware of the necessity of slavery for the southern economy – regardless of its efficacy. however, slaves become infeasible when the weather does not permit work and idle slaves becomes a financial detriment. slaves are only assets when they are working not sitting around idle.
Lol yup I agree. Having sex with men is the ultimate sexual pleasure that I hope he had the opportunity to experience at least once in his lifetime during those dark homophobic times. And glad you’ve had some mindblowing experiences with men as well Matt from the look of it. Cock feels incredible. And we guys can’t get enough of gay sex giving and/or receiving lol. ❤
“…why does anyone care about a famous deceased president private sex life and sexuality?”
It gives militant members of “The Community” another opportunity to fulfill their desperate need to legitimatize the notion of LGTBQ+. “See? Even 159 years ago sexuality was fluid.”
Yeh. Society has been getting with that notion for decades. Not everyone is on board, but more each day.
he was born long before he entered politics and eventually become president. what he did, where he went and who he was with was long established. becoming president much later in life was not reason recuse himself from that office. he was of his time and place, let’s give him space and respect what he did as president.
he was born in 1809 and died in 1865 hence he was born 215 years ago and died 129 years ago
Doubtful. He was married and had several kids. Bi? Who knows.. gay? No.
gay is twentieth century not the nineteenth century so only homosexuality was perceived
Two sons means he fucked her twice.
One of the greatest presidents we’ve ever had, who sacrificed his life to help make other people’s life better and these morons are preoccupied by what likely never happened nor has any relevance. It was not uncommon for traveling politicians and soldiers to sleep in the same bed and not freeze to death because it was so damned cold in the winters back then. The stockades/cabins between destinations were not always stocked sufficiently with material to burn and in the middle of a snow storm, you’re not going to go out and cut down a fucking tree but silly me… Read more »
Truth of the matter is, slavery was abhorrent/immoral to him, but also, it’s questionable if he saw the slaves as human beings, equal to whites, period. I saw many documentaries about him and slavery, which was at least as, if not more profitable, than owning land, “chattel slavery” was one of the most profitable in hist., of ventures, being the trade of human beings. To this very day, there’s untold billions in those Swiss bank accounts overseas, “white-washed” over hundreds of years. Companies of the day, that started out in the shipping bus., i.e., “Aetna” was a major financier of… Read more »
How do you define a man who is emotionally and mentally gay, yet afraid of physical expression?